post-image

Specialty medications and injectables are changing how we treat chronic diseases-but they’re also breaking the bank. These drugs, used for conditions like cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis, make up just 2% of all prescriptions but consume 50% of total pharmacy spending. In 2023, the U.S. spent over $200 billion on these drugs, and that number is expected to hit $350 billion by 2027. For many families and employers, the monthly cost of a single injectable can exceed $1,000. The question isn’t whether these drugs work-it’s how to make them affordable without sacrificing care.

Start with Formulary Management

One of the most effective ways to control costs is through formulary management. This means setting rules around which drugs are covered and under what conditions. Employers and insurers use prior authorization, step therapy, and quantity limits to ensure patients get the right drug at the right time-not the most expensive one.

For example, Excellus BlueCross BlueShield saved $13.64 per member per month just by requiring prior authorization for GLP-1 weight loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. These drugs aren’t inherently bad-they help people lose weight and reduce diabetes risk-but they’re often prescribed without checking if other, cheaper options were tried first. Step therapy requires patients to try a lower-cost alternative before moving to a specialty drug. If the cheaper drug works, you save hundreds per month.

The key is balance. Too many barriers can delay care. Too few, and costs spiral. Successful programs use clinical pharmacists to review requests, not automated bots. They also track outcomes: if a patient starts on a cheaper drug and still gets better, that’s a win.

Narrow Your Pharmacy Network

Not all pharmacies are created equal when it comes to specialty drugs. Most patients assume they can pick any pharmacy, but that’s not always the case-and it doesn’t have to be.

By limiting coverage to a small group of specialty pharmacies, employers can negotiate lower prices. CarelonRx found that narrow networks cut costs by 10-15%. Why? Because these pharmacies specialize in handling complex drugs. They offer home delivery, nurse support, adherence tracking, and real-time monitoring. They’re also more willing to give rebates because they know they’ll get volume.

A case study from the Children’s Hospital Association showed a $1.3 billion drug spend over three years saved 10% just by switching to a preferred CVS specialty pharmacy network. Patients didn’t notice the change. They still got their meds on time, with extra support. And satisfaction scores went up because the pharmacy staff knew their drugs inside and out.

The downside? Some patients resist switching. About 22% of employers reported a spike in customer service calls during the transition. That’s why clear communication matters. Tell patients why the change is happening. Show them the new pharmacy’s support services. Make it easy to transfer prescriptions.

Switch to Biosimilars When You Can

Biosimilars are the closest thing to a miracle in drug pricing. They’re not generics-they’re highly similar versions of complex biologic drugs made from living cells. But they cost about half as much.

The FDA has approved 42 biosimilars as of late 2023. Yet adoption remains under 30% for most conditions. Why? Prescribers are hesitant. Patients worry they won’t work as well. But the data doesn’t lie.

A 2014 ASHP study found hospitals that switched to biosimilars for rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease saved 20-30% with no drop in effectiveness. Quantum Health reported that switching just one biologic drug to its biosimilar equivalent saved $180 billion industry-wide over five years.

The biggest barrier? Education. Many doctors still think biosimilars are “inferior.” But they’re not. They’re approved using the same rigorous standards as the original. The FDA requires them to show no clinically meaningful differences.

Start by targeting high-cost biologics like Humira, Enbrel, and Remicade. These have multiple biosimilars on the market. Ask your pharmacy benefit manager for a list of available biosimilars and their savings. Then, work with your prescribing doctors to update protocols.

Move Injections Out of Hospitals

If your drug requires an injection or infusion, it’s likely being given in a hospital outpatient department. That’s expensive. A single infusion in a hospital can cost $2,000-$5,000. The same drug, given in a doctor’s office or even at home, might cost $800-$1,200.

Quantum Health analyzed 220 specialty drugs and found that 91% of patients receiving infusions in hospitals didn’t need to be there. The treatment was just as safe-and often more comfortable-in a clinic or home setting. Shifting those patients cut costs by 48%.

This isn’t just about saving money. It’s about improving care. Patients hate sitting in hospital waiting rooms for hours. They’d rather get their infusion in a quiet office or even in their own bed.

To make this work, you need three things: a clear clinical guideline for which drugs can be given outside the hospital, provider buy-in, and a payment system that rewards lower-cost settings. Prime Therapeutics recommends setting fair, competitive fees across all sites of care. That way, clinics and home health providers aren’t penalized for being cheaper.

A patient receives medicine via floating capsules from a friendly specialty pharmacy on a golden bridge.

Use Financial Assistance Programs Wisely

Many drug manufacturers offer copay assistance programs. These help patients pay their share. But here’s the catch: some of these programs don’t count toward your deductible or out-of-pocket maximum. That means you’re still paying more later.

Enter copay maximizers. These are programs offered by some insurers that redirect manufacturer assistance to cover your deductible instead of just your copay. The result? You pay $0 out of pocket today-and your deductible is still being met. That saves you money later if you need more care.

CarelonRx found that these programs let patients get specialty drugs with $0 cost-sharing while reducing employer costs by 5-8%. It’s a win-win.

But not all programs are created equal. Check your plan’s rules. Ask your pharmacy benefit manager if they offer maximizers. If they don’t, push for it. It’s one of the easiest fixes with the biggest impact.

Push for Value-Based Contracts

What if you only paid for a drug if it worked? That’s the idea behind value-based contracting.

Instead of paying a fixed price per bottle, you agree to pay more if the drug delivers great results-and less-or nothing-if it doesn’t. For example, a cancer drug might be tied to tumor shrinkage or survival rates. If the patient doesn’t respond, the manufacturer refunds part of the cost.

Prime Therapeutics saw a 45% increase in these types of contracts in 2023. Companies like Merck and Roche are starting to offer them. But they’re still rare because they require data sharing, outcome tracking, and legal agreements.

Start small. Pick one high-cost drug with clear measurable outcomes-like a multiple sclerosis drug that reduces relapses. Negotiate a contract where the price drops if the patient has more than two relapses in a year. Track results. If it works, expand it.

What Doesn’t Work

Not every cost-cutting idea is smart. Capping out-of-pocket costs sounds good, but it doesn’t reduce total spending-it just shifts it. If your plan caps your monthly cost at $100, the insurer still pays the rest. The drug company still gets paid the full price.

Same with blanket bans. If you block all new specialty drugs, you’re not saving money-you’re risking patient health. The goal isn’t to deny care. It’s to make sure care is appropriate and cost-effective.

Also, don’t rely on patient cost-sharing alone. Dr. Troyen Brennan of CVS Health warned that making patients pay more often leads to non-adherence. People skip doses. They stop refills. That leads to hospitalizations-which cost far more than the drug.

Patients receive injections at home as hospital costs dissolve into butterflies and biosimilars glow.

Implementation Checklist

If you’re an employer, insurer, or even a patient advocating for change, here’s what to do next:

  • Review your top 10 most expensive specialty drugs. Find out if biosimilars exist.
  • Check if your plan uses a narrow pharmacy network. If not, ask why.
  • Ask your PBM for prior authorization data on your top drugs. Are they being overused?
  • Find out if your plan offers copay maximizers. If not, request them.
  • Ask your doctor: “Is this drug necessary in a hospital setting, or can it be given elsewhere?”
  • Push for value-based contracts on one high-cost drug this year.

Real Results, Real Savings

One employer with 5,000 employees switched to a narrow specialty pharmacy network, started using biosimilars for all eligible patients, and moved 80% of infusions out of hospitals. In 18 months, they cut specialty drug spending by 32%. That’s $1.2 million saved annually.

Another group implemented formulary controls and copay maximizers for GLP-1 drugs. They saved $13.64 per member per month-$682,000 a year for a 4,000-member plan.

These aren’t theoretical numbers. They’re happening right now. And they don’t require massive budgets. Just smart decisions.

What’s Coming Next

By 2026, experts predict that shifting specialty drugs from medical benefit to pharmacy benefit will cut costs by 60-70% for most drugs. Why? Pharmacy benefits have better pricing controls and rebate structures.

The Inflation Reduction Act is starting to force Medicare to negotiate drug prices. That pressure is spilling into the private market. More manufacturers will offer discounts to stay competitive.

Biosimilar adoption will accelerate. The FDA’s Project BioSet is speeding up approvals. By 2027, we could see 20+ new biosimilars each year.

The future isn’t about lowering prices by force. It’s about aligning incentives-so everyone wins: patients get the drugs they need, providers deliver better care, and payers stop overpaying.

Are biosimilars as safe as the original biologic drugs?

Yes. The FDA requires biosimilars to show no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency compared to the original drug. They go through the same rigorous testing as new drugs. Over 40 biosimilars have been approved in the U.S., and millions of patients have used them with no increased risk. Studies show they work just as well for conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and cancer.

Can I switch to a cheaper drug on my own?

You can ask your doctor, but you can’t always switch without approval. Many specialty drugs require prior authorization. Even if a cheaper alternative exists, your plan may not cover it unless your doctor submits documentation showing you’ve tried other options first. Always talk to your provider before changing medications-never stop or switch on your own.

Why do some specialty drugs cost so much more than others?

Specialty drugs are complex to make, often require special storage, and are used for rare or chronic conditions with small patient populations. Companies set high prices to recoup R&D costs and generate profit. Unlike traditional drugs, they often have little competition. For example, a new cancer drug might be the only one approved for a specific genetic mutation-giving the maker a monopoly. That’s why formulary controls and biosimilars are so important.

Does using a specialty pharmacy mean I lose my choice of pharmacy?

You lose choice in the sense that only certain pharmacies are covered at lower cost. But most specialty pharmacies offer home delivery, 24/7 nurse support, and automatic refills-often better service than your local pharmacy. If you’re switched to a new pharmacy, you’ll get a letter explaining the change and how to transfer your prescription. Most patients find the support helpful, even if they’re initially frustrated.

What should I do if my insurance denies coverage for a specialty drug?

First, ask your doctor to submit an appeal with clinical documentation showing why the drug is medically necessary. Many denials are overturned with proper paperwork. Second, check if the manufacturer offers a patient assistance program. Many provide free or discounted drugs to those who qualify based on income. Third, contact your employer’s HR department-they may have a special exception process. Don’t give up. Appeals work more often than people think.

Next Steps for Patients and Employers

If you’re a patient: Ask your pharmacist or doctor about biosimilars. Ask if your infusion can be moved to a clinic or home. Check if your plan has a copay maximizer. Don’t assume you’re stuck paying $1,000 a month.

If you’re an employer or plan sponsor: Audit your top 10 specialty drugs. Talk to your pharmacy benefit manager about narrow networks, prior authorization rules, and value-based contracts. Push for data. Demand transparency. The savings are real-and they’re within reach.

The system isn’t perfect. But it’s not hopeless either. With the right strategies, specialty medications can be both life-saving and affordable.

Comments

  • Uzoamaka Nwankpa

    January 4, 2026 AT 16:51

    Uzoamaka Nwankpa

    My sister’s on a biologic for RA and pays $1,200/month out of pocket. They told her to switch to a biosimilar. She cried for three days because she’s scared it won’t work. No one talks about the emotional toll of these decisions-just spreadsheets and savings.

    It’s not just about cost. It’s about trust. You’re told this drug keeps you alive, then suddenly someone decides it’s ‘too expensive’ and you’re handed a new vial with a different name. That’s trauma wrapped in a formulary.

    I get the math. But you can’t reduce human suffering to a line item.

    They saved $13.64 per member? What about the person who had to wait six weeks for prior auth and ended up in the ER? That cost more than the drug ever did.

  • Chris Cantey

    January 4, 2026 AT 23:39

    Chris Cantey

    The entire system is a Rube Goldberg machine designed to extract wealth from the sick while pretending to optimize care.

    Formulary management? That’s just rationing with a PowerPoint.

    Narrow networks? More like corporate cartels with exclusive deals and rebates no one sees.

    Biosimilars? Sure, they’re ‘clinically equivalent’-until you’re the one who gets the 3% who have a bad reaction and your doctor shrugs and says, ‘It’s FDA-approved.’

    Value-based contracts sound noble until you realize they’re only offered when the drug already has market dominance. It’s not innovation-it’s rent-seeking with better PR.

    And don’t get me started on copay maximizers. That’s not helping patients-that’s just moving the debt from one pocket to another while the manufacturer pockets the full list price.

    The real solution? National price controls. But that’s not in the checklist, is it? Because this isn’t about health. It’s about profit.

    Everything here is a Band-Aid on a severed artery.

    We’re not fixing a broken system. We’re just making the bleeding less visible.

Write a comment

Similar Posts